Indoneziyadagi davlat va xususiy oliy ta'lim muassasalarida ingliz tilini chet tili sifatida o'qitish strategiyalari (EFL)
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11255961
Viktorina, taqdimot, guruh ishi
Annotasiya
Tadqiqot ingliz tili o'qituvchilari tomonidan universitetda ingliz tili kursini o'qitishda qo'llaniladigan ta'lim strategiyalarini o'rganishga qaratilgan. U o'qituvchilarning o'quv materiallarini talabalarga etkazish usullariga e'tibor qaratdi. Ushbu tadqiqotda davlat va xususiy universitetlarda keys tadqiqoti bilan sifatli tadqiqot usuli qo'llanildi. Ma'lumotlar sinfdagi o'zaro ta'sirni kuzatish orqali to'plangan, barcha o'zaro ta'sirlar dala yozuvi va videoga kiritilgan. Tadqiqot natijalari shuni ko'rsatadiki, sinfda ba'zi o'qitish strategiyalari mavjud. Boshlanish strategiyalari, tushuntirish strategiyalari, o'qitish-ta'lim strategiyalari, diqqatni jalb qilish strategiyalari, texnologik strategiyalar, o'rindiqlarni joylashtirish strategiyalari va tugatish strategiyalari mavjud. Strategiyalar o'quvchilarning sinfda faol muloqot qilishlari uchun foydalidir. Shunday qilib, ma'ruzachilar o'z talabalarini sinfda interaktiv qilishlari mumkin bo'lgan strategiyalarni o'rganish uchun ijodiy va innovatsion bo'lishi kerak degan xulosaga kelish mumkin.
References
Abdullah, M. Y., Bakar, N. R., & Mahbob, M. H. (2011). The dynamics of student participation in classroom : observation on level and forms of participation. Procedia-Social and Behaviour Sciences, 59(2012), 61–70. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.246
Al-Ahmad, S. & Al-Jarrah, R. S. (2015). The impact of direct corrective feedback type on the linguistic accuracy of EFL students’ writing. Asian EFL Journal, 17(2).
Alizadeh, M., Parmelee, D., Overman, I., & AlJasem, M. (2019). Preparing learners for learning in the engaged learning classroom. MedEdPublish, 8.
Bartley, K., Dimenäs, J., & Hallnäs, H. (2010). Student participation in higher education–A question of governance and power. Nordic Studies in Education, 30(03), 150-164
Bean, J. C.& Peterson, D. (1998). Grading Classroom Participation. New Directions For Teaching and Learning Journal, 1998(74), 33-4-.
Boniecki, K. A., & Moore, S. (2003). Breaking the silence: Using a token economy to reinforce classroom participation. Teaching of Psychology, 30(3), 224-227.
Boyle, J. T., & Nicol, D. J. (2003). Using classroom communication systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings. ALT-J, 11(3), 43-57.
Collier, M. J., & Powell, R. (1990). Ethnicity, instructional communication and classroom systems. Communication Quarterly, 38(4), 334-349.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th Ed). United States: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Daddi, H. (2016). Teacher's effort to develop thier students' equal participation in English speaking class. TEFLIN Proceeding. Book 3. Surabaya: Universitas Adi PGRI Adi Buana
Dallimore, E.J, Hertenstein, J.H, & Platt, M.B. (2010). Class participation in accounting courses: Factors that affect student comfort and learning. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(4), 613–629.
Dancer, D., & Kamvounias, P. (2005). Student involvement in assessment: A project designed to assess class participation fairly and reliably. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 445-454.
Diwanji, P., Hinkelmann, K., & Witschel, H. F. (2018). Enhance Classroom Preparation for Flipped Classroom using AI and Analytics. ICEIS(1), 477-483.
Elam, S. M., Rose, L. C., & Gallup, A. M. (1996). The 28th annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup poll of the public's attitudes toward the public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(1), 41.
Fassinger, P. A. (2000). How classes influence students' participation in college classrooms. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 38-47.
Hamzaoui-Elachachi, H. & Graia, W. B. (2014). Motivation in the ESP Classroom: The Case of Algerian Biomedical Engineering students. Asian ESP Journal, 10(1).
Heyman, J.E, & Sailors, J.J. (2011). Peer assessment of class participation: applying peer nomination to overcome rating inflation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(5), 605–618.
Kaplan, A., Gheen, M., & Midgley, C. (2002). Classroom goal structure and student disruptive behaviour. British Journal of Psychology, 72, 191–211.
Lee, M. W. (2014). Will communicative language teaching work? Teachers’ perceptions toward the new educational reform in South Korea. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 1-17.
Mahmud, M. (2017). Communicative styles of English students at the State University of Makassar. Gema Online Journal of Language Studies, 17(1), 223–238.
Matsuda, S., & Gobel, P. (2004). Anxiety and predictors of performance in the foreign language classroom. System, 32(1), 21-36.
Mittelmeier, J., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Whitelock, D. (2018). Overcoming cross-cultural group work tensions: mixed student perspectives on the role of social relationships. Higher Education, 75(1), 149-166.
Moore, P., & Hampton, G. (2015). ‘It’s a bit of a generalisation, but…’: participant perspectives on intercultural group assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(3), 390-406. 24. Mottet, T. P., & Beebe, S. A. Mottet, T. P. 2009. Foundations of Instructional
Communication. In T. P. Mottet, V. P. Richmond, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Handbook of instructional
