LINGUOCULTURAL FEATURES OF ANTHROPONYMY OF THE UZBEK AND ENGLISH LANGUAGES
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15517428
Kalit so‘zlar
anthroponymy, linguocultural features, personal names, Uzbek language, English language, naming conventions, cultural identity, social status, patronymics, surnames.Annotasiya
The study of anthroponymy, or the naming of individuals, is an essential aspect of linguistics, as it provides insights into the culture, values, and social structure of a society. This article examines the linguocultural features of anthroponymy in both the Uzbek and English languages, exploring how names and naming conventions reflect the unique cultural identities, historical contexts, and societal norms of these two linguistic communities. By analyzing the etymology, social function, and cultural significance of personal names in Uzbek and English, the article identifies key patterns and differences in naming practices, such as the role of patronymics in Uzbek culture versus surnames in English-speaking countries. Special attention is given to the influence of religion, historical events, and family traditions on the choice of personal names, as well as the evolution of naming practices in modern society. The study highlights how names in both languages are not only linguistic units but also carriers of cultural meaning, conveying information about family heritage, social status, and collective identity. This comparative approach provides a deeper understanding of how anthroponymy functions within the broader context of cultural and linguistic dynamics, contributing to the development of cross-cultural communication and intercultural awareness.
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yhati
Baskakova, L. F. (2004). Cultural and Linguistic Characteristics of Names. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences.
Crystal, D. (2010). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erdanova, Z. (2021). THE PROBLEM OF THE NORMS OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS. Mental Enlightenment Scientific-Methodological Journal, 2021(1), 74-81.
Gulomova, R. (2022). AUTHENTIC MATERIALS AS A SOCIOLINGUISTIC APPROACH. British View, 7(1).
Halliday, M. A. K. (2003). Thematic Structures in Anthroponymy: A Sociolinguistic Approach. London: Longman.
Jadid, M. A. (2005). The Impact of Islamic Tradition on Central Asian Naming Systems: A Case Study of Uzbek Anthroponymy. Tashkent: University of World Economy and Diplomacy.
Mamatkulova, F., & Abduvaliyeva, M. (2025, April). MODERN METHODS OF TEACHING ENGLISH. In Conference Proceedings: Fostering Your Research Spirit (pp. 186-187).
Qizi, A. D. K. (2021). MIXED-ABILITY CLASSES: FACTORS, CHALLENGES AND ADVANTAGES. Вестник науки и образования, (2-1 (105)), 44-46.
Rashidova, G. (2023). INGLIZ TILI DARSLARIDA YOZISH KO’NIKMASINI O’RGATISH JARAYONIDA ZAMONAVIY INNOVATSION TEXNOLOGIYALARDAN FOYDALANISH. Engineering problems and innovations.
Soatova Gulsunoy Kupaysinovna (2019). Foreign language teaching strategies. Наука и образование сегодня, (6-1 (41)), 85-86.
Sultonova, M. (2024, October). Features of Critical Thinking Skills for B1 Level Learners. In Conference Proceedings: Fostering Your Research Spirit (pp. 786-790).
