Exploring taboo in angkola language: Intercultural understanding in ethic education

Exploring taboo in angkola language: Intercultural understanding in ethic education

Mualliflar

  • Jamaluddin Nasution
  • Mhd. Pujiono North Sumatera University, Indonesia
  • T Silvana Sinar North Sumatera University, Indonesia
  • Nurlela Nurlela North Sumatera University, Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11256683

Kalit so‘zlar

Angkola language, culture, ethic education, taboo

Annotasiya

This research explores Angkola Language (AL) from intercultural perspective used for ethics education. Research is qualitative utilizing ethnographic method. There are three taboos in AL, such as: the taboos of fishing, naming ‘tiger’ and ‘snake’, and communication within family community. Taboos culturally foster theethical education of children either at schools or even neighborhood.

Muallif haqida

Jamaluddin Nasution

Student of Doctoral Program at North Sumatera University, Indonesia

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yhati

Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden Words. Cambridge University Press.

Amir, H. (2019). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan (Research and Development) Uji Produk Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif Proses dan Hasil. Malang: CV. Literasi Nusantara Abadi.

Anakboruna, P. M. H. D. (1993). Horja Adat Istiadat Dalihan Na Tolu (1st ed.). PT Grafitri.

Chang, W., & Cap, O. F. M. (2018). Etika dan Etiket Komunikasi: Rahasia, Sadap-Menyadap, Ujaran Kebencian, Hoax. PT Kanisius.

Humaeni, A. (2015). Tabu Perempuan dalam Budaya Masyarakat Banten. Humaniora, 27(2), 174–185.

Jay, T. (1996). What to do when Your Students Talk Dirty? Resource Publications.

Jay, T. (2009). The Utility and Ubiquity of Taboo Words. In Perspective on Physiological Science (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 153–161). Association for Physiological Science.

Kurniasari, N., Yulisti, M., & Yuliaty, C. (2015). Lubuk larangan: Bentuk perilaku ekologis masyarakat lokal dalam pengelolaan sumber daya perikanan perairan umum daratan (tipologi sungai). Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan Dan Perikanan, 8(2), 241–249.

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. Longman.

Megika, F., Syarif, & F, H. (2018). The Comparison of Taboo Words and Swearwords Used by Men and Women of Suku Anak Dalam in Desa Balai Rajo. 7, 473–480.

Narbuko, C., & Achmadi, A. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian: Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Packer, A. J. (2014). How Rude!: The Teen Guide to Good Manners, Proper Behavior, and Not Grossing People Out. Free Spirit Publishing.

Statistik, B. P. (2014). Kajian indikator sustainable development goals (SDGs). Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.

Sutarman. (2017). Tabu Bahasa dan Eufemisme (2nd ed.). Yuma Pustaka.

Ullman, S. (2007). Pengantar Semantik: Diadaptasi oleh Sumarsono. Pustaka Pelajar.

Vogel, C. (2014). Taboo Semantics. 5th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Info Communications, 225–230.

Wijana, I. D. P., & Rohmadi, M. (2017). Semantik: Teori dan Analisis. Yuma Pustaka.

Downloads

Nashr qilingan

2024-05-22

Qanday qilib iqtibos keltirish kerak

Nasution, J., Mhd. Pujiono, T Silvana Sinar, & Nurlela Nurlela. (2024). Exploring taboo in angkola language: Intercultural understanding in ethic education. Ko‘p Tillilik Muhitida Xorijiy Tillarni Rivojlantirishning Innovatsion Va Integrativ Muammolari, 1(01), 326–331. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11256683

Nashr

Sho'ba

2-SHO'BA. FILOLOGIK VA NOFILOLOGIK YO‘NALISHLARDA TILLARNI O‘QITISHNING INTEGRATIV YONDASHUVLARI: ILG‘OR TAJRIBALAR

Shunga o'xshash maqolalar

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

Shuningdek, ushbu maqolaga o'xshash maqolalar uchun kengaytirilgan qidiruvni boshlashingiz mumkin.

Loading...