Analysis of spoken discourse: Phonological features and the significance
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11256535
Kalit so‘zlar
Spoken discourse analysis, phonological features, communicative efficacy, intonation patterns, semantic load, stress and meaning, Speech Rhythm, pitch variation, prosodic elements, acoustic phonetics, pragmaticAnnotasiya
This article explores the multifaceted roles and interactions of phonological features within spoken discourse, arguing for their crucial involvement in communicative efficacy. Intonation, stress, rhythm, pitch, and prosodic elements serve as the non-lexical backdrop against which the spoken word unfolds. This phonological tapestry contributes not only to the semantic load of utterances but also to the interpersonal dynamics and pragmatic nuances of interactions. Through acoustic analyses and pragmatic observation, this paper underscores the functional weight of these features, presenting evidence from conversational data and experimental phonology.
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yhati
Brazil, D. (1985). The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge University Press.
Chen, A., Rietveld, T., & Rump, H. H. (2013). How does intonation aid communication? Journal of Pragmatics, 51, 1-15.
Cooper, N., Cutler, A., & Wales, R. (2002). Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: Evidence from native and non-native listeners. Language and Speech, 45(3), 207-228.
Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Cummins, F. (2012). Oscillators and syllables: A cautionary note. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 364.
Dauer, R. M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 51-62.
Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge University Press.
Lehiste, I. (1970). Suprasegmentals. The MIT Press.
Liberman, M., & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(2), 249-336.
Ohala, J. J. (1984). An ethological perspective on common cross-language utilization of F0 of voice. Phonetica, 41(1), 1-16.
Ramus, F., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73, 265-292.
