PRAGMATIC FEATURES OF COMPOUND SENTENCES IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES
Kalit so‘zlar
pragmatic features, compound sentences, cross-cultural communication, conjunctions, addition, ontrast, cause and effect, directness, indirectness, cultural values.Annotasiya
This article examines the pragmatic characteristics of compound sentences in English and Uzbek, focusing on how these languages use compound structures to convey meaning, context, and cultural values. Compound sentences, which link independent clauses, are essential in expressing relationships between ideas, such as addition, contrast, and cause and effect.
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yhati
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Crystal, D. (2008). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Blackwell.
Comrie, B. (1989). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology. University of Chicago Press.
Dryer, M., &Haspelmath, M. (Eds.). (2013). The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., &Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman.
Matyoqubov, O., &Axmedov, Z. (2018). Uzbek Grammar. Tashkent University Press.
Birner, B. (2012). Introduction to Pragmatics. Wiley-Blackwell.
Wierzbicka, A. (1991). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The Semantics of Human Interaction. Mouton de Gruyter.
Kasper, G., & Blum-Kulka, S. (Eds.). (1993). Interlanguage Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press.
Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The Myth of Language Universals: Language Diversity and Its Importance for Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 429-448.
Alimov, U. A. (2008). Pragmatics and Cultural Context in the Uzbek Language. UzbekistanAcademyofSciences.
Nazarov, B. (2010). Cultural Reflections in Uzbek Language Usage. KarakalpakStateUniversityPress.
