INGLIZ TILIDA EPISTEMIK VA DEONTIK MODALLIK INKORINING SEMANTIK TAFOVUTLARI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15454930
Kalit so‘zlar
epistemik modallik, deontic modallik, suppletsiya, modal fe’llar, inkor shakllari.Annotasiya
Ushbu maqola ingliz tilidagi epistemik va deontik modallik tizimida inkor shakllarining semantik tafovutlarini tahlil qiladi. Ayniqsa, can, may, must, need kabi modal fe’llarning inkor shakllari orqali ifodalangan "not possible", “possible not”, “not necessary” va “necessary not” kabi kategoriyalar o‘rganiladi. Tadqiqot ingliz tilida ushbu farqlanishning sintaktik vositalar bilan emas, balki semantik va suppletiv vositalar orqali amalga oshirilishini ko‘rsatadi.Maqola yakunida modallikda suppletsiya vositasining zarurati va kontekstual ahamiyati muhokama qilinadi.
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yhati
Palmer F.R. (1995). Modality and the English Modals (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
Kratzer A. (1981). The Notional Category of Modality. In Eikmeyer H.-J. & Rieser H. (Eds.), Words, Worlds, and Contexts (pp. 38–74). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Coates J. (1983). The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.
Lyons J. (1977). Semantics (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huddleston R., Pullum G. K. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
von Fintel K. (2006). Modality and Language. In Lepore, E., & Smith, B. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language (pp. 851–876). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hacquard V. (2011). Modality. In von Heusinger, K., Maienborn, C., & Portner, P. (Eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning (Vol. 2, pp. 1484–1515). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Collins P. (2009). Modals and Quasi-modals in English. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Heine B., Kuteva T. (2002). World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott E.C., Dasher R.B. (2002). Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
