PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE IMPOLITENESS CATEGORY

Annotasiya

This chapter deals with the emergence of impoliteness in language and its analysis. In studying the emergence of impoliteness in language, we first encounter the problems of face work. In this section, we will analyze whether impoliteness in language is innate or not. Culpepper raises this question (whether impoliteness is innate or not) and shows both positive and negative answers to this question. This article touches upon the main point that requests, suggestions, criticism are not considered effective, although there are exceptions, mentioned above in expressions expressing gratitude. The ambiguity of speech during conversation is manifested in pragmatic factors, that is, the speaker's opinion can express both advice and a threat. Patterns are closely related to meaning. Firstly, different meanings of words differ in the place of their use in different patterns, and secondly, words that share a given pattern, as a rule, share aspects of meaning. Like non-verbal means, verbal means also express impoliteness. In this regard, taboo words are a means of attracting attention, but taboo words cannot fully serve as a means of expressing impoliteness. Words uttered by shouting (shouting) (often such words are not understandable and not clear) are impolite.