THE ROLE OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK STRATEGIES AND LEARNER UPTAKE IN DEVELOPING COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20731864
Kalit so‘zlar
corrective feedback, learner uptake, explicit correction, recast, clarification request, metalinguistic feedback, elicitation, repetition, communicative competenceAnnotasiya
This study examines how corrective feedback influences learner uptake in English as a Foreign Language classrooms. Six types of corrective feedback are identified and discussed: explicit correction, recasts, clarification requests, metalinguistic feedback, elicitation, and repetition, alongside corresponding categories of learner uptake, ranging from successful repair to needs-repair. The analysis draws on foundational research in second language acquisition to explore how different feedback strategies vary in their effectiveness at prompting learner engagement and error correction. Particular attention is given to the role of learner motivation and individual variation in shaping feedback outcomes. The paper concludes by considering how corrective feedback can be integrated strategically into communicative classroom practice to support both linguistic accuracy and communicative competence, positioning feedback not as a source of anxiety but as a meaningful driver for language growth.
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yhati
DeKeyser, R. M. (1993). The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 77(4), 501–514.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66.
