COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING (CLT) VS TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR)

COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING (CLT) VS TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR)

Mualliflar

  • Mashrabjonova Zuhra

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20377842

Kalit so‘zlar

CLT, TPR, language teaching, communication, learning methods

Annotasiya

This article compares Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) and Total Physical Response (TPR), analyzing their principles, advantages, and limitations in language teaching. It highlights their effectiveness in different contexts and suggests combining both approaches for optimal learning outcomes.

Muallif haqida

Mashrabjonova Zuhra

Student of group 2326

Uzbekistan State World Languages University

zukhra7980@gmail.com

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yhati

Asher, J. (1977). Learning Another Language Through Actions. Los Gatos, CA: Sky Oaks Productions.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Nashr qilingan

2026-05-26

Qanday qilib iqtibos keltirish kerak

Mashrabjonova Zuhra. (2026). COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING (CLT) VS TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE (TPR). TILSHUNOSLIK VA CHET TILLARNI O‘QITISHDA ZAMONAVIY RAQAMLI TEXNOLOGIYALARDAN FOYDALANISH MAVZUSIDAGI XALQARO ILMIY-AMALIY ANJUMAN, 1(7), 489–491. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20377842
Loading...