TEACHERS' VIEWS ON ACADEMIC WRITING ASSIGNMENTS GENERATED BY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: HOW DO THEY AFFECT THE TEACHING METHODS IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

TEACHERS' VIEWS ON ACADEMIC WRITING ASSIGNMENTS GENERATED BY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: HOW DO THEY AFFECT THE TEACHING METHODS IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

Mualliflar

  • Shaikenova Dana

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19781196

Kalit so‘zlar

academic writing; artificial intelligence; English for academic purposes; teaching strategies; higher education.

Annotasiya

Generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher education have rapidly influenced academic writing, raising concerns about academic and linguistic integrity. This transformation in foreign language teaching creates a critical conflict between the effectiveness of technology and the ability of students to learn through real means. To answer this new question, this study examines the attitude of teachers of “Academic Writing” and “English for Academic Purposes” at two Kazakhstani universities towards tasks generated by artificial intelligence, with an emphasis on pedagogical responses and linguistic integrity. In the course of the study, conducted using mixed methods, 15 teachers were interviewed. Descriptive statistics were used to identify the validity, evaluation, and institutional support of quantitative data. The transcripts of the interviews were examined during the thematic analysis. The results show that most teachers have worked with AI-generated assignments that are well-written grammatically but lack creativity, critical thinking, or student voice. Excessive use of AI also worries teachers about critical thinking and reflective learning in students. Teachers use multimodal assessments, oral defenses, reflective comments, and drafts to emphasize the importance of the learning process rather than the results. The study highlights the lack of institutional norms regarding artificial intelligence in assignments and shows how foreign language teachers combine technological innovation and academic integrity.

Muallif haqida

Shaikenova Dana

Doctoral student
Kazakh Abylai Khan University of
International Relations and World Languages
Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yhati

Abdelrahim, A., Abdelrahim, M. Teaching and assessing metadiscoursal features in argumentative writing: A professional development training for EFL teachers. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2019. 30 (1), 70–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12264

Abramova, V., Veksler, A., Glubokova, E., Nazmutdinova, T., Popova, R., Chernyshova, E., Kalabina, I. Objective assessment of learning outcomes: Peculiarities of design and application of assessment tools in modernconditions of digital development. Science for Education Today, 2024. 14(1), 25–148. https://doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2401.06

Barrasso, A., Spilios, K. A scoping review of literature assessing the impact of the learning assistant model. International Journal of STEM Education, 8 (1), Article 12, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00267-8

Braun, V., Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology,3 (2), 2006, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Butakor, P. Exploring pre service teachers’ beliefs about the role of artificial intelligence in higher education in Ghana. International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science, 2023, 3(39). https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ijitss/30092023/8057

Jared, B., Hanna, K. Academic integrity: Unique challenges for professional healthcare education with new emerging threats. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (179), 2024, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20596

Kaur, A., Bhatia, M., Stea, G. A survey of smart classroom literature. Education Sciences, 12 (2), 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020086

Luckin, R. AI and the future of learning: Balancing innovation and responsibility. Routledge, 2024.

Mahlangu, T. A bibliometric analysis of assessment as learning in higher education. Proceedings of the World Conference on Teaching and Education,3(1), 2024, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.33422/worldcte.v3i1.603

Selwyn, N. Education and AI: Criticalperspectives. Polity Press, 2024.

Singh, M. Maintaining the integrity of the South African university: The impact of ChatGPT on plagiarism and scholarly writing. South African Journal of Higher Education, 37 (5), 2023. https://doi.org/10.20853/37-5-5941

UNESCO. AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, 2024. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-and-education-guidance-policy-makers

Yan, D. How ChatGPT automatic text generation impacts learners in an L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Open Science Framework Preprints, 2023. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/s4nfz

Zhao, J., Liu, Y. A developmental view of authorial voice construction in master’s thesis: A case study of two novice L2 writers.SAGE Open,11(4), 2021. Article 21582440211054483. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211054483

Downloads

Nashr qilingan

2026-04-27

Qanday qilib iqtibos keltirish kerak

Shaikenova Dana. (2026). TEACHERS’ VIEWS ON ACADEMIC WRITING ASSIGNMENTS GENERATED BY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: HOW DO THEY AFFECT THE TEACHING METHODS IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS. THE USE OF MODERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN LINGUISTICS AND FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING. INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE, 1(4), 576–583. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19781196
Loading...