THE PRACTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF LINGUISTIC AND PHILOLOGICAL RESEARCH IN LANGUAGE EDUCATION

THE PRACTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF LINGUISTIC AND PHILOLOGICAL RESEARCH IN LANGUAGE EDUCATION

Mualliflar

  • Majidova Ruxshona
  • Suyunova Firuza

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19675109

Kalit so‘zlar

Linguistic research, Philology, Language education, Language teaching, Curriculum development, Second language acquisition, Research-based pedagogy, Corpus linguistics, Teacher training, Communicative competence

Annotasiya

This article examines the practical significance of linguistic and philological research in language education, emphasizing how these fields inform and enhance teaching practices. Using a mixed-methods approach, the study investigates teachers’ use of linguistic concepts, philological insights, and research-based strategies in curriculum design and classroom instruction. Findings indicate that educators who integrate research-informed methods observe improved learner engagement, comprehension, and communicative competence. The discussion highlights the benefits of connecting theoretical research with classroom practice while identifying challenges such as variability in teacher training and access to resources. The study concludes that professional development and collaborative frameworks are essential to maximize the impact of linguistic and philological research in modern language education.

Mualliflar haqida

Majidova Ruxshona

Uzbekistan State World Languages University

English philology faculty

ruxshonamajidova0220@gmail.com

Suyunova Firuza

Uzbekistan State World Languages University

English philology faculty

ushsgshs362@gmail.com

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yhati

Bauer, Laurie et al., The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology, Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 130

Celce-Murcia, Marianne, The Grammar Book, Heinle Cengage, 2010, p. 45

Larsen-Freeman, Diane & Anderson, Marti, Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching, Oxford University Press, 2011, p. 72

Lightbown, Patsy M. & Spada, Nina, How Languages are Learned, Oxford University Press, 2013, p. 105

McEnery, Tony & Hardie, Andrew, Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press, 2012, p. 101

Erkinovna, O. P., & Nilufar, Q. (2024). The significance of vocabulary teaching. Tanqidiy nazar, tahliliy tafakkur va innovatsion g ‘oyalar, 1(1), 283-285.

Nilufar, Q. (2025). Internet tili va raqamli kommunikatsiyada yangi janr shakllarining lingvopragmatik xususiyatlari. Taraqqiyot Spektri, 1(3), 23-24.

Qiyomidinova Nilufar Qahramon Qizi (2025). THE PSYCHOLINGUISTIC MECHANISMS OF SOCIAL MEDIA LANGUAGE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK. Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Philosophy and Culture, 5 (12), 126-130. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17951393

Qiyomidinova, N. (2025). Ijtimoiy tarmoqlarning hayotimizdagi o ‘rni. The Lingua Spectrum, 2(1), 530-536.

Downloads

Nashr qilingan

2026-04-21

Qanday qilib iqtibos keltirish kerak

Majidova Ruxshona, & Suyunova Firuza. (2026). THE PRACTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF LINGUISTIC AND PHILOLOGICAL RESEARCH IN LANGUAGE EDUCATION. “FILOLOGIYA VA TIL TA’LIMI: INNOVATSION YONDASHUVLAR ASOSIDA XORIJIY TILLARNI O‘QITISHNING SAMARALI USULLARINI ISHLAB CHIQISH HAMDA ULARNI TA’LIM JARAYONIGA TATBIQ ETISH YO‘LLARI” MAVZUSIDAGI RESPUBLIKA ILMIY-AMALIY ANJUMAN, 1(3), 837–841. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19675109
Loading...