INCORPORATING MULTIMEDIA MATERIALS IN TEACHING 11TH- GRADE STUDENTS
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15517521
Kalit so‘zlar
Multimedia, Teaching, 11th Grade, High School Students, Engagement, Learning Outcomes, Comprehension, Interactive Learning, Digital Technologies.Annotasiya
This study explores the impact of incorporating multimedia materials on the engagement, comprehension, and learning outcomes of 11th-grade students across various subjects. With the increasing prevalence of digital technologies in daily life, integrating multimedia elements such as videos, interactive simulations, audio clips, and dynamic presentations into the classroom offers a promising approach to cater to diverse learning styles and enhance traditional teaching methodologies. This research investigates how multimedia can foster a more interactive and stimulating learning environment, moving beyond passive reception of information to active participation and critical thinking. Furthermore, it examines the practical considerations for teachers in selecting, integrating, and evaluating multimedia resources to ensure their effective application in the 11th-grade curriculum. The findings of this study aim to provide educators with insights into leveraging multimedia to create more engaging, effective, and relevant learning experiences for contemporary high school students.
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yhati
Baddeley, A. (2012). Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1-29.
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning (4th ed.). Wiley.
Dousay, T. A. (2016). The impact of interactive media on student engagement. TechTrends, 60(2), 166-172.
Huang, Y. M., Kuo, Y. H., Lin, Y. T., & Cheng, S. C. (2008). A ubiquitous learning environment for supporting listening and speaking. Computers & Education, 51(2), 522-536.
Kearney, M., Schuck, S., Burden, K., & Aubusson, P. (2012). Viewing mobile learning from a pedagogical perspective. Research in Learning Technology, 20.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358-368.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
Scherer, R., Tondeur, J., & Siddiq, F. (2019). The relation between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their integration of information and communication technology in education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 27, 1-20.
Shaikh, A., & Khoja, R. (2020). The role of educational technology in enhancing professional development and teaching competence among secondary school teachers. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 13(7), 1709-1725.
Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Yu, W. C. (2009). The effect of interactive multimedia learning on elementary students' learning effectiveness. Computers & Education, 52(2), 347-357.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load theory. In G. M. Clark (Ed.), Instructional implications of cognitive sciences (pp. 119-129). Prentice Hall.
Wang, S. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2012). A flipped classroom approach to improve students' learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 96, 124-135.
Yusop, N. K., & Ab. Rashid, M. (2021). The Effect of Interactive Multimedia to Improve the Cognitive Learning Outcome in Senior High School's Student. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(3), 101-119.
Zhang, Y., & Zou, B. (2020). The Effect of Mobile-based Interactive Multimedia on Thinking Engagement and Cooperation. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 673-690.
