WHY WE UNDERSTAND MORE THAN WE SPEAK: THE NATURAL ORDERS OF LANGUAGE

WHY WE UNDERSTAND MORE THAN WE SPEAK: THE NATURAL ORDERS OF LANGUAGE

Mualliflar

  • Jo’rayev Sattorbek Normamatovich

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15504961

Kalit so‘zlar

receptive skills, productive skills, language acquisition, input, output, teaching, learning, language proficiency tests

Annotasiya

In any language acquisition, most learners excel in receptive skills— listening and reading—quickly compared to improving in productive skills, such as speaking and writing. This article explores the main reasons why language learners are faced with this imbalance—that one is superior to the other. In many language proficiency tests, applicants score higher results in reading and listening as they understand well enough; however, balancing the language abilities through speaking and writing seems almost impossible. In turn, this phenomenon creates a paradox in language acquisition: understanding language, mainly listening to real-life conversation or reading, is often prioritized over the ability to express thoughts and use them productively. This study aims to address the notable factors that cause the discrepancy, including cognitive processing, input-output load, and the role of teaching that helps to bring balance to skill development.

Muallif haqida

Jo’rayev Sattorbek Normamatovich

UzSWLU, 3rd year student

Scientific teacher: Xayrulloyeva Lola

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yhati

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Newbury House.

Nation, I. S. P. (2007). The four strands. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt039.0

Karashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Pergamon Press.

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.

Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.

Axmadaliyeva, X. (2021). AKADEMIK LITSEYNING NOFILOLOGIK YO’NALISHLARIDA TAHSIL OLAYOTGAN O’QUVCHILARNING INGLIZ TILI DARSLARIDA KOMMUNIKATIV KOMPETENSIYASINI RIVOJLANTIRISH: AKADEMIK LITSEYNING NOFILOLOGIK YO’NALISHLARIDA TAHSIL OLAYOTGAN O’QUVCHILARNING INGLIZ TILI DARSLARIDA KOMMUNIKATIV KOMPETENSIYASINI RIVOJLANTIRISH. Журнал иностранных языков и лингвистики, 4(9). извлечено от https://phys-tech.jdpu.uz/index.php/fll/article/view/1942.

Nation, I. S. P. (2007). The four strands. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt039.0

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–256). Newbury House.

Erdanova, Z. (2021). THE PROBLEM OF THE NORMS OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS. Mental Enlightenment Scientific-Methodological Journal, 2021(1), 74-81.

Rashidova, G. (2024). Scientific ethics and etiquette of uzbek students in writing. Проблемы инновационного и интегративного развития иностранных языков в многоязычной среде, 416-420.

Gulomova, R. (2024). Embracing cultural classes: unveiling the significance of culture in EFL education. O ‘zbekiston davlat jahon tillari universiteti konferensiyalari, 665-671.

Kholbutayeva, S., & Gulshoda, R. (2025). PEDAGOGICAL INNOVATIONS: HOW TO ENHANCE STUDENT ENGAGEMENT THROUGH KAHOOT?. YANGI O ‘ZBEKISTON, YANGI TADQIQOTLAR JURNALI, 2(7), 141-145.

Erdanova, Z. (2019). Onomastic is a mirror culture. In Science and practice: a new level of integration in the modern world (pp. 149-152).

To’ychiyev, B., & Mamatkulova, F. (2024). The role of think-aloud strategy in teaching reading comprehension to elementary learners. O ‘zbekiston davlat jahon tillari universiteti konferensiyalari, 161-166.

Sultonova, M., & Usmonaliyeva, M. (2024). Pragmalinguistics: exploring the social dynamics of language use. O ‘zbekiston davlat jahon tillari universiteti konferensiyalari, 633-638.

SULTONOVA, M. (2024). On the issue of critical thinking.

Sultonova, M. (2024, October). Features of Critical Thinking Skills for B1 Level Learners. In Conference Proceedings: Fostering Your Research Spirit (pp. 786-790).

Downloads

Nashr qilingan

2025-05-26

Qanday qilib iqtibos keltirish kerak

Jo’rayev Sattorbek Normamatovich. (2025). WHY WE UNDERSTAND MORE THAN WE SPEAK: THE NATURAL ORDERS OF LANGUAGE. TALABALAR ILMIY KONFERENSIYASI "TILSHUNOSLIK MASALALARI – YOSH TADQIQOTCHILAR NIGOHIDA", 1(3), 164–167. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15504961

Nashr

Sho'ba

1-SHO‘BA. CHET TILLARINI O‘QITISHDA INNOVATSION YONDASHUVLAR
Loading...