THE PRACTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF LINGUISTIC AND PHILOLOGICAL RESEARCH IN LANGUAGE EDUCATION

THE PRACTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF LINGUISTIC AND PHILOLOGICAL RESEARCH IN LANGUAGE EDUCATION

Mualliflar

  • Sobirova Dildora
  • Abdiraximova Samira Muzaffarovna


https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19666035

Kalit so‘zlar

linguistics, philology, language education, communicative competence, cultural awareness, methodology, innovation, teaching strategies

Annotasiya

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the practical significance of linguistic and philological research in modern language education. In the context of globalization and digital transformation, the process of language learning has shifted from traditional memorization-based approaches to more interactive and communicative models. Linguistics, as a scientific study of language, offers structured knowledge about grammar, phonetics, and semantics, while philology focuses on cultural, historical, and contextual dimensions of language use. The integration of these two disciplines allows educators to design more effective teaching methodologies that address both accuracy and fluency. The study emphasizes that linguistic knowledge enhances learners’ structural competence, whereas philological insights develop intercultural awareness and contextual understanding. Furthermore, the article examines how modern technologies and innovative teaching strategies contribute to the practical application of linguistic and philological research in classrooms. The findings suggest that a balanced combination of these approaches significantly improves students’ communicative competence, motivation, and overall language proficiency.

Mualliflar haqida

Sobirova Dildora

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Pedagogy, Associate Professor

Uzbekistan State World Languages University

Abdiraximova Samira Muzaffarovna


 Student of Uzbekistan State World Languages University

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yhati

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. Pearson Education.

Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide. Cambridge University Press.

Chomsky, N. (2002). Syntactic structures (2nd ed.). Mouton de Gruyter.

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English. Pearson Longman.

Kramsch, C. (1998). Language and culture. Oxford University Press.

Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Saussure, F. de. (2011). Course in general linguistics. Columbia University Press.

Thornbury, S. (2006). An A–Z of ELT: A dictionary of terms and concepts. Macmillan Education.

Sobirova, F. I. (2025). Speech manipulation in electoral programs. Philological Research: Language, Literature, Education, 1(1.1).

Sobirova, F. I. (2025, February). Idrok va tilning o‘zaro ta’siri: Tilni qayta ishlash va o‘zlashtirishda psixolingvistik nuqtai nazar. The Lingua Spectrum, 2.

Sobirova, F. I. (2026). Ongga ta’sir qilish san’ati: Suhbatdan oldingi va keyingi manipulyatsiyalar. Obrazovanie nauka i innovatsionnye idei v mire, 91. Sobirova, F. I. (2025, October). Saylovoldi nutqlarida manipulyativ strategiyalarning pragmatik tahlili. Modern Education and Development, 35(1).

Sobirova, F. I. (2025, March). Neyrolingvistikada nutqiy ta’sir. Лучшие интеллектуальные исследования, 41(2).

Downloads

Nashr qilingan

2026-04-21

Qanday qilib iqtibos keltirish kerak

Sobirova Dildora, & Abdiraximova Samira Muzaffarovna
. (2026). THE PRACTICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF LINGUISTIC AND PHILOLOGICAL RESEARCH IN LANGUAGE EDUCATION. “FILOLOGIYA VA TIL TA’LIMI: INNOVATSION YONDASHUVLAR ASOSIDA XORIJIY TILLARNI O‘QITISHNING SAMARALI USULLARINI ISHLAB CHIQISH HAMDA ULARNI TA’LIM JARAYONIGA TATBIQ ETISH YO‘LLARI” MAVZUSIDAGI RESPUBLIKA ILMIY-AMALIY ANJUMAN, 1(3), 716–719. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19666035
Loading...