TRANSLATION IN REGARD THE CULTURAL NUANCES OF THE LANGUAGE
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17540253
Kalit so‘zlar
linguistic and intellectual pix of the world, non-equivalence and lexical gaps, semantics and pragmatics of language signs, Classification of culturemes, In modern linguocultural research, linguocultural material through potential of some other language, lexicographers pursuits at a dictionary to end up as environment friendly and nonideological tool as possible, Equivalence (or its absence) is a marginal phenomenon, “Translation starts offevolved with setting up equivalence on the word level” the journey of cutting-edge lexicographers actually shows that in the method of compilation of any bilingual or extra lingual translation dictionary, the problems of conveying subculture specificity.Annotasiya
The following paragraph raises the question of the need to enhance the structural range and operational abilities of the modern dictionary (bi- or multilingual) to avoid laciness in the transmission of cultures and non-equivalent phrases into every other language. Without it the dictionary is incomplete and languages are unequal. The article offers with a number of alternatives of asymmetry reflection of the cultureless in the context of social and ethno-psychic reality of a native-speaking community. The specifics of lexicographical transmission is found in order to emphasize the want of in addition investigation of the linguistic map of the world. Linguistics of the recent years is a properly illustration of everyday traits in the modern humanitaristics: we witness an an increasing number of obvious inclination to interdisciplinarity and interparadigm in approaches to such complicated objects as a language, deep perception of it as an anthropological phenomenon in the immanent relationships with psychological and behavioural matrices, with ethno cultural origins of the linguistic picture of the world.
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yhati
H o l m e s J. S. The Name and Nature of Translation Studies. 3d International Congress of Applied Linguistics: Abstracts. Copenhagen, 1972; H o l m e s J. S. The Name and Nature of Translation Studies. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, Department of General Studies, 1975.
К о м и с с а р о в В. Н. Слово о переводе. – М., 1973; Ш в е й ц е р А. Д. Перевод и лингвистика. – М., 1973; Ф е д о р о в А. В. Введение в теорию перевода. – М. 1958.
NewmarkP. Approaches to Translation. – New York a.o.: Prentice Hall, 1988. – P. 19.
Catford J.C. A Linguistic Theory of Translation. – London: OxfordUniversity Press, 1965.
М и н ь я р – Б е л о р у ч е в Р. К. Теория и методы перевода. – М.: Московский лицей, 1996. – С.29.
Nida E., Taber C. Theory and Practice of Translating. – Leiden: Brill, 1969.
Benjamin W. Illuminations. – New York, 1955. - P.75.
Encyclopedia Britannica. Version 1997. CD-ROM.
Баpхударов Л. С. Язык и перевод. – М.: Международные отношения, 1975; Ревзин И. И., Р о з е н ц в е й г В. Ю. Основы общего и машинного перевода. – М.: Высшая школа, 1964. –С.64.
К у з ь м и н Ю. Г. К вопросу о предмете и месте теории перевода. // Вопросы теории и практики научно-технического перевода. P, 19
