ARE ZOOS DOING MORE HARM THAN GOOD?
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20377947
Kalit so‘zlar
Zoos, Wildlife Conservation, Animal Welfare, Captivity, Ethics, Biodiversity, Conservation Biology, Endangered SpeciesAnnotasiya
This study investigates whether zoos do more harm than good by analyzing their impact on wildlife conservation and animal welfare. Zoos are widely promoted as institutions that contribute to biodiversity protection, species preservation, and public education. However, there is increasing global debate regarding the ethical implications of keeping wild animals in captivity.This research is based on a qualitative review of secondary sources, including reports from the World Association of Zoos and Aquariums (2022), the Born Free Foundation (2021), National Geographic (2023), and scientific literature on animal welfare. The findings suggest that zoos contribute positively to conservation through breeding programs, species survival plans, and educational activities. However, serious welfare concerns remain, such as chronic stress, stereotypic behaviors, reduced life quality, and inability to express natural instincts.
The study concludes that while zoos provide important conservation benefits, they must undergo significant ethical reform, including improved living conditions, stronger regulations, and a shift toward habitat-based conservation rather than captivity-centered models.
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yhati
World Association of Zoos and Aquariums (2022). Conservation and Ethics Reports
Born Free Foundation (2021). Animal Welfare in Captivity
National Geographic (2023). Wildlife Conservation Analysis
Fraser, D. (2008). Understanding Animal Welfare
Clubb, R. & Mason, G. (2003). Captivity Effects on Wild Animals
World Health Organization of Wildlife (various reports).
