ANIMAL TESTING: NECESSARY OR UNETHICAL
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20377451
Kalit so‘zlar
animal testing, ethics, medical progress, animal rights, scientific research, medical advancement, surgical procedures, alternative methods, computer modeling, regulation.Annotasiya
This article looks at the ethics and science behind animal testing. It asks whether such testing is necessary or wrong. The study takes into account the views of experts such as Peter Singer, Jane Goodall and Francis Collins. The article argues that while animal testing has led to advances in science and medicine, it also raises serious concerns about the fair treatment and rights of animals. Some people believe that animals have their own dignity and should not suffer unnecessarily. Others believe that animal testing is still essential for finding life-saving treatments.
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yhati
Russell, W.M.S. and Burch, R.L. (1959) The principles of humane experimental technique. London: Methuen, p. 238.
Taylor, K., Gordon, N., Langley, G. and Higgins, W. (2008) ‘Estimates for worldwide laboratory animal use in 2005’, Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 36, pp. 327–342.
Ibrahim, D.M. (2006) ‘Reduce, refine, replace: the failure of the three R’s and the future of animal experimentation’, University of Chicago Legal Forum. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=888206 (Accessed: 7 January 2011).
Ferdowsian, H.R. and Beck, N. (2011) ‘Ethical and scientific considerations regarding animal testing and research’, PLoS ONE, 6(9), e24059. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024059
Heart Views (n.d.) Heart Views. Available at: www.heartviews.org.
