THE EMOTIONAL LANDSCAPE OF MURRAY BAIL’S EUCALYPTUS: DESIRE, ATTACHMENT, AND ISOLATION
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20006632
Kalit so‘zlar
Eucalyptus, affect, desire, attachment, isolation, taxonomy, dominationAnnotasiya
This article examines how Murray Bail’s Eucalyptus (1998) constructs an “emotional landscape” through three interlocking dynamics: desire, attachment-as-control, and isolation. The novel’s central premise—Holland offering his daughter Ellen in marriage to any suitor who can name every eucalyptus on his property—operates as more than a quirky plot device. It stages a politics of feeling in which desire is routed through classification and possession, attachment is enacted as surveillance and containment, and isolation emerges as both spatial enclosure and affective deprivation. Methodologically, the study uses close reading, thematic coding, and narratological analysis of recurring devices (taxonomic listing, the gaze, fairy-tale framing, and storytelling as seduction). The discussion synthesizes key scholarship on Eucalyptus that reads the novel through ecofeminist critique, cultural-symbolic accounts of the eucalypt, legal/postcolonial reflections on naming, and critical plant studies. Findings suggest that the novel’s emotional economy is driven by a “logic of domination” in which naming and owning become affective practices-organizing characters’ longing, dependence, and estrangement-while the text’s parodic mode both exposes and, at times, risks reproducing gendered and colonial patterns.
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yhati
Bail, M. (1998). Eucalyptus. Text Publishing. (textpublishing.com.au)
Gibson, P. (2023). The Dirt Witches’ counter-narrative: A response to Murray Bail’s “Eucalyptus.” Ecozon@: European Journal of Literature, Culture and Environment, 14(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.37536/ECOZONA.2023.14.1.4872 (ecozona.eu)
Grbich, J. (2001). The scent of colonialism: Mabo, Eucalyptus and excursions within legal racism. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 15(1), 121–148. (Cambridge University Press & Assessment)
Jacobs, M. (2001). The ‘good oil’: Eucalypts and Murray Bail’s Eucalyptus. Antipodes: A North American Journal of Australian Literature, 15(1), 40–46. (Research @ Flinders)
Martin, S. K. (2004). The wood from the trees: Taxonomy and the eucalypt as the new national hero in recent Australian writing. JASAL: Journal of the Association for the Study of Australian Literature, 3, 81–94. (Academia)
McNeer, R. (2002). Happily ever after: William Shakespeare’s The Tempest and Murray Bail’s Eucalyptus. Antipodes: A Global Journal of Australian/New Zealand Literature, 16(2), 171–176. (Digital Commons WSU)
Rooks, A. (2007). Parodying patriarchy: Murray Bail’s Eucalyptus and the “logic” of domination. LiNQ: Literature in North Queensland, 34, 24–33.
Schoene, B. (2025). Arboreal obliquity or trees doing the human in Murray Bail’s Eucalyptus. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 66(2), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2024.2305262 (Taylor & Francis Online)
