BRIDGING THE GAP IN EMI: A BOTTOM-UP APPROACH TO POLICY AND PRACTICE
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20006450
Kalit so‘zlar
English Medium Instruction, EMI policy, language management, higher education, student challenges, language planningAnnotasiya
English Medium Instruction (EMI) has become increasingly prevalent in higher education globally, yet a persistent gap between top-down institutional policies and bottom-up classroom realities continues to challenge its effective implementation. This paper reports on a qualitative study examining the EMI-related challenges experienced by 183 students across various academic courses through an open-ended questionnaire. Using an inductive coding approach, eight categories of challenges were identified, including vocabulary and terminology difficulties, academic writing challenges, content comprehension issues, communication barriers, difficulties with lecturers' accents, information overload, and miscellaneous institutional challenges. Approximately 23.5% of participants reported no difficulties. Drawing on Spolsky's three-dimensional framework of language policy—language practices, language beliefs, and language management—the findings reveal significant misalignments between EMI policy aspirations and lived student experiences. The paper concludes with targeted recommendations for policymakers and university administrations, advocating for a shift from a 'language-as-medium only' model towards a 'language-as-support-for-learning' approach.
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yhati
Liao, S. J., Zhang, L. J., & May, S. (2026). English-medium instruction (EMI) language policy and implementation in China's higher education system: Growth, challenges, opportunities, solutions, and future directions. Current Issues in Language Planning, 27(2), 241–260.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2025.2453263
Macaro, E., Curle, S., Pun, J., An, J., & Dearden, J. (2018). A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching, 51(1), 36–76.
Macaro, E., & Rose, H. (2023). Introduction to the special issue on English medium instruction: Areas of research needing urgent attention. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 13(2), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.38274
McDonough, K., & Chaikitmongkol, W. (2007). Teachers' and learners' reactions to a task-based EFL course in Thailand. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 107–132.
Orduna-Nocito, E., & Sánchez-García, D. (2022). Aligning higher education language policies with lecturers' views on EMI practices: A comparative study of ten European universities. System, 104.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102692
Rahman, M. M., & Hu, G. (2025). EMI policy and practice divides in China, Japan, Malaysia and Nepal: Policymakers' neoliberal ideologies and multilingual classroom realities in higher education. English Today, 41(4), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078425000136
Spolsky, B. (2004). Language Policy. Cambridge University Press.
Tajik, L., et al. (2024). Gaps between policy aspirations and enactment: Graduate students' struggles with academic English amidst a turbulent transition to the EMI environment in Kazakhstani universities. Current Issues in Language Planning, 25(2), 212–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2023.2283651
