LANGUAGE, POWER AND SOCIETY: A SOCIOLINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL VOCABULARY

LANGUAGE, POWER AND SOCIETY: A SOCIOLINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL VOCABULARY

Mualliflar

  • Panjiyeva Ismigul Panji qizi

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19873880

Kalit so‘zlar

political vocabulary, sociolinguistics, discourse, semantics, pragmatics, power, ideology

Annotasiya

This article examines the relationship between political vocabulary and social meaning through a sociolinguistic perspective, structured according to the IMRAD (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion) model. The study focuses on how political vocabulary functions as a medium of power and social influence within contemporary communication. Data were collected from scholarly literature, political speeches, and official texts, and analyzed using descriptive, comparative, terminological, and discursive methods. The findings show that political vocabulary is not limited to fixed definitions; instead, it is a flexible system in which meanings expand and shift depending on context, ideology, and communicative purpose. Political terms often carry both conceptual and evaluative meanings, allowing them to shape public perception and reinforce or challenge social interpretations. Overall, political vocabulary emerges as a dynamic linguistic resource that connects language, society, and power relations.

Muallif haqida

Panjiyeva Ismigul Panji qizi

2 nd year master degree student at Uzbekistan State World languages university

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yhati

Budaev, E. V., & Chudinov, A. P. (2006). Modern political linguistics. http://philology.ru/linguistics1/budaev-chudinov-06a.htm

Budaev, E. V., & Voroshilova, M. B. (Eds.). (2011). Modern political linguistics: Textbook. Ural State Pedagogical University.

Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge.Fairclough, Norman. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Longman, 1995.

Crystal, D. (2008). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th ed.). Blackwell.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Maslova, V. A. (2008). Political linguistics. Yekaterinburg.

Sheygal, E. I. (2019). Semiotics of political discourse. http://www.twirpx.com/file/56756/

Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Sage.

Umirov, I. E. (2024).Siyosiy leksika (tilshunoslik) ilmiy fan sifatida.

Downloads

Nashr qilingan

2026-05-01

Qanday qilib iqtibos keltirish kerak

Panjiyeva Ismigul Panji qizi. (2026). LANGUAGE, POWER AND SOCIETY: A SOCIOLINGUISTIC ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL VOCABULARY. TILSHUNOSLIKDA ANTROPOSENTRIZM: YANGI YONDASHUVLAR VA TADQIQOTLAR MAVZUSIDAGI RESPUBLIKA ILMIY-AMALIY ANJUMAN, 1(5), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19873880
Loading...