IMPROVING PUPILS' READING PROFICIENCY VIA INNOVATIVE TEACHING METHODS
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19681519
Kalit so‘zlar
reading proficiency, innovative teaching methods, reading comprehension, digital storytelling, gamification, project-based learning, EFL pupils.Annotasiya
Reading proficiency occupies a central position in language education, yet many pupils continue to struggle with the transition from decoding written symbols to constructing genuine meaning from text. This paper examines the potential of innovative teaching methods — including digital storytelling, collaborative reading strategies, gamification, and project-based learning — to address the persistent challenges of reading development in school-age learners. By analysing current pedagogical research, the paper identifies the mechanisms through which these approaches stimulate reading motivation, build comprehension strategies, and improve overall reading fluency. The findings suggest that innovation in reading instruction is not merely a matter of introducing new technologies, but of fundamentally rethinking the relationship between the reader, the text, and the learning environment.
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yhati
Ashirkulovna, M. F., & Iroda, C. BENEFITS OF DISTANCE LEARNING.
Ashirkulovna, M. F., & Erkinovna, U. M. OBSTACLES IN LEARNING THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE. Zbiór artykułów naukowych recenzowanych., 66.
Betts, E. A. (1946). Foundations of reading instruction. American Book Company.
Gambrell, L. B. (2011). Seven rules of engagement: What's most important to know about motivation to read. The Reading Teacher, 65(3), 172–178.
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3025–3034.
Ko, M. H. (1995). Glossing in L2 reading: A meta-analytic investigation of its effects on comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 207–225.
Ohler, J. B. (2013). Digital storytelling in the classroom: New media pathways to literacy, learning, and creativity (2nd ed.). Corwin Press.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.
Robin, B. R. (2016). The power of digital storytelling to support teaching and learning. Digital Education Review, 30, 17–29.
Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 479–530.
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Autodesk Foundation.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420–432.
Маматкулова, Ф. А. (2020). Учебная программа и преподавание в среднем образовании. NovaInfo. Ru, (119), 30-32.
Маматкулова, Ф. А. (2020). Использование современных образовательных технологий в формировании лингвокультурной компетенции студентов. NovaInfo. Ru, (117), 63-65.
Маматкулова, Ф. А. (2020). Эффективные педагогические технологии повышения навыков письменного дискурса. NovaInfo. Ru, (119), 32-35.
Маматкулова, Ф. А. (2020). Особенности критического мышления в повышении межкультурной компетентности студентов. NovaInfo. Ru, (119), 35-37.
