STRUCTURE AND SEMANTIC PROPERTIES OF VERBS IN THE ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15517400
Kalit so‘zlar
English verbs, Uzbek verbs, verb structure, semantics, tense, aspect, modality, voice, transitivity, valency, morphology, syntax, auxiliary verbs, comparative linguistics.Annotasiya
This article presents a comparative linguistic analysis of English and Uzbek verbs, focusing on their structural and semantic properties. Verbs, as core sentence elements, are analyzed in terms of morphology, syntax, and meaning. The study examines key verb categories—tense, aspect, modality, and voice—highlighting how they are expressed differently in each language. English relies on auxiliary verbs to form complex verb phrases, whereas Uzbek employs a richer inflectional system that encodes multiple meanings through morphological changes. The paper also explores differences in aspectual distinctions (perfective vs. imperfective), transitivity, valency, and argument structure. While English verbs typically show fixed transitivity, Uzbek verbs offer greater flexibility through suffixation. Additional analysis includes the role of word order, auxiliary and modal verbs, and how verbs reflect cultural and cognitive frameworks. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of how actions, agency, and causality are linguistically structured in English and Uzbek.
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar ro‘yhati
Bauer, L. (2000). Morphological Productivity. Cambridge University Press.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Pearson Longman.
Bulatova, A. A. (1994). The Syntax and Morphology of Uzbek Verbs. Tashkent University Press.
Comrie, B. (1981). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. University of Chicago Press.
Crystal, D. (2003). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge University Press.
Haspelmath, M., & K. W. König (2003). Understanding Morphology. Arnold Publishers.
Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. Harcourt Brace.
Shvedova, N. Yu. (1980). Russian Grammar: Syntax and Morphology. Russian Language Publishers.
Мухташамова, П. (2022). Linguoculturological features of phraseological units of the english and uzbek language. Переводоведение: проблемы, решения и перспективы, (1), 351-353.
Kupaysinovna, S. G. (2020). The significance of sociocultural competence in teaching foreign languages. Проблемы науки, (4 (52)), 93-95.
Rashidova, G., & Khilola, K. (2024). THE ROLE OF INTONATION AND STRESS IN MEANING. TANQIDIY NAZAR, TAHLILIY TAFAKKUR VA INNOVATSION G ‘OYALAR, 1(3), 72-75.
Sultonova, M. (2024, October). Features of Critical Thinking Skills for B1 Level Learners. In Conference Proceedings: Fostering Your Research Spirit (pp. 786-790).
Abulkosimovna, E. Z. (2022). Synonymous analysis of professional words in English and Uzbek. Frontline Social Sciences and History Journal, 2(05), 15-22.
Gulomova, R. (2020). Sociolinguistic competence of L2 students. TJE-Tematics journal of Education ISSN, 2249-9822.
Alimdjanovna, K. M. (2024). ADVANTAGES OF SCAFFOLDING IN TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION. Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Philosophy and Culture, 4(5-1), 163-166.
Kholbutayeva, S., & Gulshoda, R. (2025). PEDAGOGICAL INNOVATIONS: HOW TO ENHANCE STUDENT ENGAGEMENT THROUGH KAHOOT?. YANGI O ‘ZBEKISTON, YANGI TADQIQOTLAR JURNALI, 2(7), 141-145.
Koppelman, P., & Gulomova, R. (2024). Amerika ingliz tilidagi leksik o'zgarishlarning madaniyatlararo muloqotga ta'siri. O ‘zbekiston davlat jahon tillari universiteti konferensiyalari, 619-624
